<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tallan&#039;s Technology Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tallan.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tallan.com</link>
	<description>Tallan&#039;s Top Technologists Share Their Thoughts on Today&#039;s Technology Challenges</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 09:44:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on BizTalk File Backup by Filyuza</title>
		<link>http://blog.tallan.com/2010/03/26/biztalk-file-backup/comment-page-1/#comment-955</link>
		<dc:creator>Filyuza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 09:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.tallan.com/biztalk/?p=101#comment-955</guid>
		<description>Can you please tell why you need Backup Transport of Send Port? If the Backup files is performed you specified manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you please tell why you need Backup Transport of Send Port? If the Backup files is performed you specified manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recover from a WCF Service Fault, Part 2 (Generic ServiceClientFactory Class) by Job</title>
		<link>http://blog.tallan.com/2009/05/06/recover-from-a-wcf-service-fault-part-2-generic-serviceclientfactory-class/comment-page-1/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>Job</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 09:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.tallan.com/dotnetreflections/2009/05/recover-from-a-wcf-service-fault-part-2-generic-serviceclientfactory-class/#comment-936</guid>
		<description>Secondly I cannot get this work with non-generated proxy&#039;s.
They don&#039;t implement &#039;System.ServiceModel.ClientBase&#039;.

Another thing I don&#039;t understand:
 private void Channel_Faulted(object sender, EventArgs e)
      {
         ((ICommunicationObject)sender).Abort();
         var factory = (ChannelFactory)factories[typeof(T)];
         factory.CreateChannel();
      }

If the factory creates a new channel like this, is the referenced channel refreshed? I don&#039;t see how the new channel updates the faulted one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Secondly I cannot get this work with non-generated proxy&#8217;s.<br />
They don&#8217;t implement &#8216;System.ServiceModel.ClientBase&#8217;.</p>
<p>Another thing I don&#8217;t understand:<br />
 private void Channel_Faulted(object sender, EventArgs e)<br />
      {<br />
         ((ICommunicationObject)sender).Abort();<br />
         var factory = (ChannelFactory)factories[typeof(T)];<br />
         factory.CreateChannel();<br />
      }</p>
<p>If the factory creates a new channel like this, is the referenced channel refreshed? I don&#8217;t see how the new channel updates the faulted one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recover from a WCF Service Fault, Part 2 (Generic ServiceClientFactory Class) by Job</title>
		<link>http://blog.tallan.com/2009/05/06/recover-from-a-wcf-service-fault-part-2-generic-serviceclientfactory-class/comment-page-1/#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>Job</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 07:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.tallan.com/dotnetreflections/2009/05/recover-from-a-wcf-service-fault-part-2-generic-serviceclientfactory-class/#comment-933</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this code! I was creating something like this myself but you fixed it nicely!

Their is one situation i worry about:
-Channel is created
-Channel faults
-Event is fired to recover the channel
-Appication tries to use the channel (before its recreated)
-Channel is recreated

Is their a good way to get around this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this code! I was creating something like this myself but you fixed it nicely!</p>
<p>Their is one situation i worry about:<br />
-Channel is created<br />
-Channel faults<br />
-Event is fired to recover the channel<br />
-Appication tries to use the channel (before its recreated)<br />
-Channel is recreated</p>
<p>Is their a good way to get around this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multi Tenant Architecture via Dependency Injection: Part 2 by Nathaniel Engelsen</title>
		<link>http://blog.tallan.com/2010/07/16/multi-tenant-architecture-via-dependency-injection-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Engelsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tallan.com/?p=570#comment-691</guid>
		<description>Paul,

You can definitely wire Castle Windsor / MicroKernel into ASP.Net MVC and use it to provide dependency injection and a controller factory. As long as you have that at your disposal you should be able to create a framework to accomplish Goals 1, 2, and 3. The only sticking point, in my mind, would be the late bound dependency injection done with reflection in OrderModule.Load(). Good luck, and feel free to share your results!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>You can definitely wire Castle Windsor / MicroKernel into ASP.Net MVC and use it to provide dependency injection and a controller factory. As long as you have that at your disposal you should be able to create a framework to accomplish Goals 1, 2, and 3. The only sticking point, in my mind, would be the late bound dependency injection done with reflection in OrderModule.Load(). Good luck, and feel free to share your results!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multi Tenant Architecture via Dependency Injection: Part 2 by Nathaniel Engelsen</title>
		<link>http://blog.tallan.com/2010/07/16/multi-tenant-architecture-via-dependency-injection-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Engelsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tallan.com/?p=570#comment-690</guid>
		<description>Paul,

You can definitely wire Castle Windsor / MicroKernel into ASP.Net MVC and use it to provide dependency injection and a controller factory.  As long as you have that at your disposal you should be able to create a framework to accomplish Goals 1, 2, and 3.  The only sticking point, in my mind, would be the late bound dependency injection done with reflection in OrderModule.Load().  Good luck, and feel free to share your results!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>You can definitely wire Castle Windsor / MicroKernel into ASP.Net MVC and use it to provide dependency injection and a controller factory.  As long as you have that at your disposal you should be able to create a framework to accomplish Goals 1, 2, and 3.  The only sticking point, in my mind, would be the late bound dependency injection done with reflection in OrderModule.Load().  Good luck, and feel free to share your results!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multi Tenant Architecture via Dependency Injection: Part 2 by Paul Hinett</title>
		<link>http://blog.tallan.com/2010/07/16/multi-tenant-architecture-via-dependency-injection-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Hinett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tallan.com/?p=570#comment-683</guid>
		<description>Very interested in these blog posts and will be following closely, this is just what I am about to get into on an existing project I have....the only difference being is that my project is currently using Castle Windsor.

I&#039;m hoping that the same process can be done using Castle instead of Ninject...if not i&#039;m hoping I can both Castle + Ninject side-by-side.

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interested in these blog posts and will be following closely, this is just what I am about to get into on an existing project I have&#8230;.the only difference being is that my project is currently using Castle Windsor.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping that the same process can be done using Castle instead of Ninject&#8230;if not i&#8217;m hoping I can both Castle + Ninject side-by-side.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multi Tenant Architecture via Dependency Injection: Part 1 by Multi Tenant Architecture via Dependency Injection: Part 3</title>
		<link>http://blog.tallan.com/2010/07/11/multi-tenant-architecture-via-dependency-injection-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>Multi Tenant Architecture via Dependency Injection: Part 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tallan.com/?p=421#comment-668</guid>
		<description>[...] Part 1 we discussed web application Multi Tenant Architecture, and briefly discussed how dependency [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part 1 we discussed web application Multi Tenant Architecture, and briefly discussed how dependency [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Beyond the Flat File Wizard in BTS 2006 &#8211; Part 1 by Biranchi</title>
		<link>http://blog.tallan.com/2006/12/06/beyond-the-flat-file-wizard-in-bts-2006-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Biranchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogbiztalk.com/?p=47#comment-599</guid>
		<description>The above information(Wrap Text) in creating FF schema was really helpful in solving my requriment.Appreciate your effort and thanks a lot for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above information(Wrap Text) in creating FF schema was really helpful in solving my requriment.Appreciate your effort and thanks a lot for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multi Tenant Architecture via Dependency Injection: Part 1 by Multi Tenant Architecture via Dependency Injection: Part 2</title>
		<link>http://blog.tallan.com/2010/07/11/multi-tenant-architecture-via-dependency-injection-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>Multi Tenant Architecture via Dependency Injection: Part 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tallan.com/?p=421#comment-598</guid>
		<description>[...] Tallan&#039;s Technology Blog  Tallan&#039;s Top Technologists Share Their Thoughts on Today&#039;s Technology Challenges   Skip to content HomeAbout       &#171; Multi Tenant Architecture via Dependency Injection: Part 1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tallan&#39;s Technology Blog  Tallan&#39;s Top Technologists Share Their Thoughts on Today&#39;s Technology Challenges   Skip to content HomeAbout       &laquo; Multi Tenant Architecture via Dependency Injection: Part 1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ASP.NET MVC Primer &#8211; Presentation Materials by Jagan</title>
		<link>http://blog.tallan.com/2010/06/23/asp-net-mvc-primer-presentation-materials/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Jagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 04:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tallan.com/2010/06/23/asp-net-mvc-primer-presentation-materials/#comment-465</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m able to access both of them. Thx!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m able to access both of them. Thx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
